Examining the Speeches of Imran Khan (Ex-Pakistani Premier) After Regime Change Operation Through Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis Technique

Authors

  • Fakiraha Batool Kazmi Post Graduate Student, Department of English Government College University Women Faisalabad, Pakitan
  • Zahida Hussain Assistant Professor, Department of English Government College University Faisalabad, Pakistan.
  • Syed Waqas Ahmad Professor/Chairman, Department of Chemical, Polymer and Process Engineering, Faisalabad Campus University of Engineering and Technology Lahore

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36755/ijll.v3i2.81

Keywords:

Stylistic Techniques, Regime Change, Rhetoric Devices, Fairclough’s Model, Critical Discourse Analysis

Abstract

The primary aim of this study is to investigate the descriptive, interpretative, and discursive elements present in the speeches of Imran Khan, the former Prime Minister of Pakistan, following the regime change operation. The study will center on a thorough analysis of the language employed in these speeches to expose the underlying ideological influences shaping the narratives. Additionally, it seeks to provide valuable insights into the personal ideologies held by the speaker. Data for this research is collected from electronic media sources and analysed utilizing Fairclough's model of critical discourse analysis, incorporating a mixed-method approach to ensure a comprehensive data analysis comprising of both qualitative and quantitative techniques to gain an inclusive understanding of the speeches and conveyed ideologies. Qualitative analysis involves close reading to identify themes, rhetorical devices, and linguistic strategies used by politicians, revealing narrative structures and ideological foundations. Quantitative methods complement these findings, measuring linguistic patterns like word frequency, sentiment analysis, and rhetorical tropes to provide empirical evidence and enhance the study's rigor and validity.

References

Alonso, P. 2014. A multi-dimensional approach to discourse coherence: from standardness to creativity. , Peter Lang AG, Internationaler Verlag der Wissenschaften.

Azar, B. S. 2002. Understanding and Using English Grammar. New York: Longman.

Bannet, J. 1976. Linguistics Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University press., Cambridge:

Cambridge University press.

Basaria, S., A. D. Coviello, T. G. Travison, T. W. Storer, W. R. Farwell, A. M. Jette, R. Eder, S. Tennstedt, J. Ulloor and A. Zhang 2010. Adverse events associated with testosterone administration. New England Journal of Medicine. 363(2): 109-122.

Bhatia, A. 2006. Critical discourse analysis of political press conferences. Discourse & Society.

(2): 173-203.

Collins, P. 2009. Modals and quasi-modals in English, Rodopi.

Emanuel, E. J., D. L. Fairclough, J. Slutsman and L. L. Emanuel 2000. Understanding economic and other burdens of terminal illness: the experience of patients and their caregivers. Annals of internal medicine. 132(6): 451-459.

Fairclough, N. 1989. Discourse and power. Language and power. London, Longman. Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and social change. Cambridge, Polity press.

Fairclough, N. 1993. Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse & Society. 4(2): 133-168.

Fairclough, N. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The critical study of language. New York:

Longman.

Fairclough, N. 2000. Discourse, social theory, and social research: The discourse ofwelfare reform. Journal of sociolinguistics. 4(2): 163-195.

Fairclough, N. and I. Fairclough 2018. A procedural approach to ethical critique in CDA. Critical Discourse Studies. 15(2): 169-185.

Fairclough, N., B. Jessop and A. Sayer 2002. Critical realism and semiosis. Alethia. 5(1): 2-10. Fairclough, N. and R. Wodak 1997. Critical discourse analysis. Discourse studies: . A multidisciplinary introduction. 2: 258-284.

Fowler, D. 1979. Selection for Winterhardiness in Wheat. II. Variation within Field Trials 1. Crop Science. 19(6): 773-775.

Fowler, R., B. Hodge, G. Kress and T. Trew 1979. Language and Control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Gusev, A., S. H. Lee, G. Trynka, H. Finucane, B. J. Vilhjálmsson, H. Xu, C. Zang, S. Ripke, B. Bulik-Sullivan and E. Stahl 2014. Partitioning heritability of regulatory and cell-type-specific variants across 11 common diseases. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 95(5): 535-552.

Houda, M. 2016. A Critical Discourse Analysis of Hillary Clinton's Presidential Campaign

[Master's thesis, Univerity Abdelhamid Ibn Badis]. http://e-biblio.univmosta.dz/handle/123456789/9141.

Huddleston, R. and G. K. Pullum 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jaworski, A. and N. Couplend 2006. The Discourse Reader (2nd edition). USA: Routledg.

Johnstone, B. 2018. Discourse analysis., John Wiley & Sons.

Jorgensen, M. W. and L. Phillips 2002. Discourse analysis as theory and method. London, Sage Publication.

Kinneavy, J. L. 1971. A theory of discourse: The aims of discourse.

Kirvalidze, N. and N. Samnidze 2016. Political discourse as a subject of interdisciplinary studies.

Journal of teaching and education. 5(1): 161-170.

McCarthy, M. 1991. Discourse analysis for language teachers. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. .

Mumby, D. K. and R. P. Clair 1997. Organizational discourse.

Pennycook, A. 2001. Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction, Routledge.

Potter, J. and D. Edwards 1996. Discourse analysis. In Introducing Psychological Research.

Palgrave, London.

Schiffrin, D. 1987. Discourse markers, Cambridge University Press.

Van Dijk, T. A. 1995. Power and the news media. Political communication and action. 6(1): 9-36. Van Dijk, T. A. 1997. Political Discourse and Political Cognition. Printed at Congress Political Discourse, Aston University.

Van Dijk, T. A. 1998. Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach, Sage.

Wang, J. 2010. A critical discourse analysis of Barack Obama’s speeches. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 1(3): 254-261.

Westney, P. 1995. Modals and Periphrastics in English: An Investigation into the Semantic Correspondence between Certain English Modal Verbs and their Periphrastic Equivalents., Tubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.

Wodak, R. 1995. Critical linguistics and critical discourse analysis. In J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman, & J. Blommaert (Eds.), Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 204– 10). . Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-16

How to Cite

Fakiraha Batool Kazmi, Zahida Hussain, & Syed Waqas Ahmad. (2024). Examining the Speeches of Imran Khan (Ex-Pakistani Premier) After Regime Change Operation Through Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis Technique. Inception - Journal of Languages and Literature, 3(2), 67–92. https://doi.org/10.36755/ijll.v3i2.81