Positive Discourse Construction Around Dietary Sugars Consumption

A Semio-Linguistic Analysis of Eco-Advertisements in Pakistan

Authors

  • Moushaffa Shahid Coordinator at STEM School, Faisalabad Author
  • Dr. Maimoona Abdulaziz Assistant Professor, HOD Department of English, National University of Modern Languages, Faisalabad Author
  • Zaira Qayyum BS English Scholar, Department of English, Riphah International University Faisalabad Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36755/

Keywords:

ECDA, Linguistic Analysis, White poison, Diabetes, Discourse Analysis, Eco-advertisements, Dietary Sugars

Abstract

Eco-advertisements promote products with environmentally friendly attributes. The way a product is perceived by the public can have a significant impact on its success. From shaping attitudes to influencing usage, the public's perception of a product is key. The consumption of dietary sugar products has become a topic of increasing concern worldwide, given its potential impact on the ecology of the human body. This research is also based on positive discourse construction around dietary sugar consumption by using an analysis of eco-advertisements from a semiotic and linguistic perspective.in Pakistan. “The objectives of this research are: firstly, to highlight the marked semiotic instances concerning eco-advertisements. Secondly, to identify lexical items that have positive connotations in context with dietary sugars products, and lastly, to interpret the semiotic and lexical evidence as a tool for constructing positive discourse. The data has been collected through simple random sampling and the basic framework of Arran Stibbe has been used for data analysis. The results of this study suggest that eco-advertising  in Pakistan tend to employ persuasive techniques such as positive framing, emotional appeals, and visual symbolism to present dietary sugar consumption in a favorable light and these advertisements emphasize the natural origins of sugars and promote their nutritional benefits.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acha, W. A. (2022). AN ECOCRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF ANTHROPOCENTRISM IN THE CAMEROONIAN PRESS. International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS), 5(2), 120-140.

Alwin Fill, and Hermine Penz, eds. 2018. The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics. New York: Routledge.

Baum, L. (2012), ‘It’s not easy being green . . . or is it? A content analysis of environmental claims in magazine advertisements from the United States and the United Kingdom, Environmental Communication, 6(4), 423–440.

Benwell, B. and Stokoe, E. 2006. Discourse and identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Fill, A. and Mühlhäusler, P. (eds.) (2001), The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology and Environment. London, New York: Continuum.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978), Language as a Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. (2001). New ways of meaning: The challenge to applied linguistics. In A. Fill & P. Mühlhäusler (Ed.), The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology, and Environment (pp. 175-202). New York: Continuum.

Hansen, A. (2010), Environment, Media, and Communication. London: Routledge.

Haugen, E. (1972), ‘The Ecology of Language’, in A. S. Dil (ed.), The Ecology of Language: Essays by Einar Haugen. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 325–339. Reprinted in A. Fill and P. Mühlhäusler (eds. 2001), pp. 57–66.

Kress, G. 2010. Multimodality: a social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.

Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Martin, J. R. and Rose, D. (2008), Genre Relations: Mapping Culture. London: Equinox.

Popa, D. and Petrovici, I. (2014), ‘Ecodesign in advertising: Aesthetic aspects’, Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 163: 73–78.

Rooks, J. (2010), ‘100 green ads: a biennial green ad language study’, [WWW document]. http://thesoapgroup.com/images/media/8.3cii_2010LangStudy.pdf [August 24, 2015].

Sebeok, T. A. (2001). Sign: An Introduction to Semiotics. London: University of Toronto Press.

Stibbe, A. (2015). Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by. London: Routledge.

Stöckl, H. (2014), ‘ “He Begs to Inform Every Person Interested”: A diachronic study of address and interaction in print advertising’, Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies, 25(2): 81–106.

Xiong, T. (2014). Shallow environmentalism: A preliminary eco-critical discourse analysis of secondary school English as a foreign language (EFL) texts in China. The Journal of Environmental Education, 45(4), 232-242.

Zhang, B., Chandran Sandaran, S., & Feng, J. (2023). The ecological discourse analysis of news discourse is based on deep learning from the perspective of ecological philosophy. PloS one, 18(1), e0280190.

Zheng, X., & Jin, F. An Eco-critical Discourse Analysis on Chinese and Foreign Media Coverage of Wuhan’s Lockdown. Journal of Social Science and Humanities ISSN, 1811, 1564.

Downloads

Published

28-12-2023

How to Cite

Positive Discourse Construction Around Dietary Sugars Consumption: A Semio-Linguistic Analysis of Eco-Advertisements in Pakistan. (2023). Khaldunia-Journal of Social Sciences, 3(1), 110-127. https://doi.org/10.36755/