A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONS AND RESEARCH JOURNALS ON OBESITY USING VAN DIJK’S MODEL

Authors

  • Hamida Haidar MPhil Scholar, Department of Applied Linguistics, GCUF Author
  • Syed Kazim Shah Assistant Professor, Department of Applied Linguistics, GCUF Author
  • Alina Awan MPhil Scholar, Department of Applied Linguistics, GCUF Author

Keywords:

Medical Discourse, Van Dijk, Applied Linguistics, Hegemony, Discourse Analysis, Critical Discourse Analysis

Abstract

This present study aims at exploring the CDA approach to determine the differences in the discourse of research articles in medical journals and associations. The study investigates how the associations delete, select, construct or generalize information for their benefits. The information was gathered from medical research articles and associations about obesity. World Health Organization (WHO), Obesity Medicine Association (OMA), National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Health Services (NHS), Healthline, Mayo Clinic are among the organizations that have been chosen for this study. The macro structure of Van Dijk model is used to address the research questions and to determine whether medical journals and associations are on the same page or not. As a result, associations have more authority than journals. The results of this descriptive self-study are summarized in graph charts and tables.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1985). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.

Foucault, M. (1971). Orders of discourse. Social Science Information, 10(2).

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings. London: Longman.

Gee, J. P. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: The Falmer Press

Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Penguin.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language and Social Semiotics. London: Edward Arnold

Ofica, D. & Hamuddin, B. (2018). An Overview of Medical Discourse Studies: Cultural Variation across Genres and Registers. London: Routledge.

Sampson, G. (1980). School of Linguistics: Competition and Evaluation. London: Longman

Van Dijk, T.A. (1998). Critical discourse analysis. Available: http://www.hum.uva.nl/teun/cda.htm. (1/25/2000)

Whitehead, K. & Kurz, T. (2008). Saints, sinners and standards of femininity: discursive constructions of anorexia nervosa and obesity in women's magazines, Journal of Gender Studies, 17(4). New York, Pantheon. DOI: 10.1080/09589230802420086.

Downloads

Published

26-12-2021

How to Cite

A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF MEDICAL ASSOCIATIONS AND RESEARCH JOURNALS ON OBESITY USING VAN DIJK’S MODEL. (2021). Inception-Journal of Languages and Literature, 1(2), 1-17. https://journalsriuf.com/index.php/IJLL/article/view/14