WHITENESS IN SHAKESPERE’S SONNETS

Authors

  • Muhammad Mansha Scholar, Department of English Literature, Government College University Faisalabad Author

Keywords:

Exclusionary, Dehumanizing, Binary, Dark Lady, Bright Friend, White Privilege, Whiteness

Abstract

Now a day the racial theorem is being used to study Shakespeare's works. The problem of whiteness is explored in his sonnets. He cherishes whiteness more than blackness. Elizabethan policies included the idea that being white was a sign of supremacy, and the sonnets served as a cover for contemporary racial views. Racism and racial injustice are inextricably linked to whiteness. Though invisible, it is a universal phenomenon. Whiteness allows people with fair skin to economically and culturally oppress people of color. According to Hall, an important aspect of early modern writings that contributes to the creation of the white subject is the "Africanist" presence. Whiteness is a potent, covertly hegemonic discourse that oppresses people of color. Whiteness and blackness are in binary antagonism. This African-American presence ultimately fosters a sense of white superiority. This conflicting mindset rekindles the debate over whiteness. The research demonstrates how Shakespeare's portrayals of a young man and a dark lady privilege whiteness and shape white identity. The young guy has been presented in charming terms, whereas Dark Lady has been regarded negatively in terms of culture, morality, and sexuality. The black lady is condemned for acting immorally. She is not considered one of the chaste women. Shakespeare creates a triple-turned-whore character for her. The young, fair, and intelligent person is glorified, and his generational continuation is taken into consideration. The study helps to dismantle the stereotype that exempts Shakespeare from racism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Applebaum, B. (2016). Critical whiteness studies. In Oxford research encyclopedia of education. UK: Oxford University Press.

Birt, R. E. (2004). The bad faith of whiteness. In G. Yancy (eds.), What white looks like (pp. 55-64). New York and London: Routledge.

Colin, S. A., & Lund, C. L. (2010). The intersections of white privilege and racism: Moving forward. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 125, 91-94. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.365

De Tocqueville, A. (1969). Democracy in America. New York: Harper & Row.

Du Bois, W. E. B. (1920). The Souls of White Folk. In Darkwater: Voices from Within the Veil (pp. 29-52). New York: Harcourt, Brace and Howe.

Dyer, R. (1997). White: Essays on race and culture. USA & Canada: Routledge.

Hall, K. F. (2003). ‘These bastard signs of fair’: Literary Whiteness in Shakespeare’s Sonnets. In A. Loomba (Eds.), Post-Colonial Shakespeares (pp. 64-83). London and New York: Routledge.

Hall, K. F. (2018). Fair Texts/Dark Ladies: Renaissance Lyric and the Poetics of Color. In Things of Darkness (pp. 62-122). Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

Leek, C. (2014). Whiter Shades of Pale: On the Plurality of Whitenesses. In M. S. Kimmel (Eds.). Privilege a Reader, (pp. 211-225). Boulder, Colorado: Westview.

Lindner, A. (2018). Defining Whiteness: Perspective on Privilege. Gnovis, 18(2), 43-58.

McIntosh, P. (1989). White Privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack. Peace and Freedom, 49, 10-12.

McClendon, I. I. I. (2004). On the nature of whiteness and the ontology of race: Toward a dialectical materialist analysis. In G. Yancy (eds.), What white looks like (pp. 211-226). New York and London: Routledge.

Morrison, T. (1992). Playing in the dark: Whiteness and the literary imagination. New York: Vintage.

Shakespeare, W. (2009). The Sonnets of Shakespeare. T. G. Tucker (Eds.). New York, US: Cambridge University press.

Walker, D. (1829). An Appeal to the Colored Citizens of the World. US: Boston.

Downloads

Published

24-06-2022

How to Cite

WHITENESS IN SHAKESPERE’S SONNETS. (2022). Inception-Journal of Languages and Literature, 2(1), 38-52. https://journalsriuf.com/index.php/IJLL/article/view/22